Invite the grounds team into the review
Your landscaper may know where irrigation reaches, which plants were recently installed and what work is scheduled next. Share that knowledge with WTG when the association considers pretreatment. It can help identify differences between areas that look similar on a map and make the proposed boundaries easier to understand.
Agree on the work sequence
Discuss mowing, pruning, plant removal and new landscaping before the application date is confirmed. The treatment scope should reflect the vegetation expected to remain. If grounds work changes the footprint, ask WTG to review it rather than assume the original proposal still applies. Name the association contact who can coordinate decisions across both providers.
Clarify preparation responsibilities
A task can be missed when each contractor expects the other to handle it. Confirm who completes the agreed preparation, who moves any relevant items and who reports that the area is ready. A WTG application proposal should not be assumed to include landscape services unless explicitly stated. Clear responsibilities make both the schedule and cost easier for the board to assess.
Keep irrigation and resident use in view
Identify watered areas, paths, gathering spaces and locations used by children or pets. These details help shape application boundaries and project-specific instructions. Coordinate any care decisions with the people responsible for the plants. Generic online advice should not replace the actual product information or the agreed plan for the grounds.
Give the landscaper the relevant completion information
After the work, share the treated-area record and the contact for follow-up questions. Significant later pruning, planting or irrigation changes should be noted where they affect those areas. This supports an informed review without assuming every maintenance task automatically requires respraying. A useful handoff helps the association keep both services working from the same property information.